03-28-2024, 07:01 PM
(03-28-2024, 05:38 PM)Dill Wrote: No. Could not. The "prosecutorial discretion" to which you refer does not signal some party turn to authoritarianism working to secure
the machinery of the state to control elections for a leader who wants immunity from rule of law.
I didn't say it did. I was responding to one of pally's criteria. That being "a Lack of respect for the Constitution and law". A turn to authoritarianism is not required to illustrate the Democrat's disdain for either. You're equating my showing the Dems disdain for both as evidence that they have the same, supposed, objectives as Trump. I am merely illustrating their obvious lack of respect for both.
Quote:You could make a case for bad
policy from this, which will likely trigger policy revision, people voted out of office, etc. E.g., Oregon's revision of lax drug policy.
You are still confusing "rule of law" with "law and order."
No. Am not.
