150 Armed Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

[BmorePat87]

(01-04-2016, 11:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: First: answering a question with a question is rude.

Your question was in response to a question I asked. Rude much?

Quote:Secondly:


They didn't break into anybody's house and if they did; they did so peacefully.

They have not threatened to shoot anyone.

But to answer your question: If you did that, you are not being "peaceful".

Now: What acts have they done that is dangerous to human life?  

They didn't, they broke into a federal building. That's much worse. 

They also did threaten to use force if they were forcibly removed from the building. Considering the fact that they're armed, we aren't reaching why suggesting they mean with guns. 

So considering all of that, I am going to apply what you said in your post and infer that you believe that they are not "peaceful". 

As far as your question, an armed break in and seizure of any building has the potential to be dangerous to human life. Had there been someone inside and they lawfully tried to defend their agency's building, they could have been shot. I'll use the same analogy: if I break into a building with a gun, is there a chance someone inside could be seriously injured? (the question is rhetorical, so don't freak out on me)