04-16-2024, 12:19 AM
(04-15-2024, 09:37 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: LOL now it matters?
sorry buddy but we are using %'s not total numbers. Each group should be 50% random audits unless there's an anomaly happening. Did you even see my post how they got 1600 millionaires for $480m? to me that says we need more audits for that group.
I mean god effing dam, you harp about how the rich don't pay their fair share but you're willing to let them skip on their fair share of audits?
absolutely Bogglling
Now what matters? Math? And this is funny. I’m pretty sure you support the GOP. The ones who were totally against giving more funding to the IRS, and the ones who had a budget proposal last year that would have cut IRS funding so much so that it actually increased the deficit because it would have hindered our ability to collect.
https://www.budget.senate.gov/chairman/newsroom/press/memorandum-cuts-to-irs-tax-enforcement-would-increase-the-deficit#:~:text=January%209%2C%202023%20%2D%20CBO%20estimated,%24114%20billion%20over%20ten%20years
Didn’t see anything about random audits.
37% of audits going to the top 12% sounds reasonable to me.
If it was entirely random. Sure 50/50 would be ok, maybe even more skewed toward the rich.
But from what I’ve seen this is saying 63% of total audits are households making $200,000 or less. And like I said. That is roughly 88% of the country.
I’d be fine with everybody making over idk let’s say 10 million to be automatically audited.
