04-16-2024, 06:52 PM
(04-16-2024, 06:27 PM)CJD Wrote: I wouldn't curse the skies if we took Fisher in the 2nd. We need depth at OT, and he will likely be a good backup RT on day 1 with potential to stick as a starter depending on the scheme, I just don't think he's one of the 50 best players in the draft.
This is what Dane Brugler's "The Beast" says about him:
I like that he's young and already has a lot of experience. It seems like Brugler believes that, had he gone back to college for his senior year, he'd have a high chance of being a 2nd round pick or higher in 2025. So taking him at 49 would be kind of like trading our 2nd rounder for a potential 1st rounder/2nd rounder next year. Take that for what you will. He's got upside and flashes the ability to be a great RT. I just feel like he'd be outstanding value at 80
Nice, that is about what I see in Blake Fisher and you were right in the first place, I was kind of put off by Bowers being there and made me reach a
touch on Fisher in the 2nd round. Have to get a RT somewhat early. I like that Fisher has good upside with his length and quick feet, needs to really
work on his balance which is why I want Amarius Mims so much, he kind of has it all even if he doesn't have a lot of snaps.
Mims wasn't there in this draft, neither was Latham or Fautanu and I don't like Guyton. I would take Bowers over Guyton every time.
