Final Mock

[*ochocincos*]

(04-26-2024, 12:07 PM)JoeyB2023 Wrote: Yes I would flat line period if a Tight end was taken today.  I think alot of the tight ends have talent but we do not need one.. at all.  We pass yr after yr.  The ceiling on gesicki imo is so high with burrow at qb and I said the same about hurst when coming in.  I think our current 3 tight ends are perfect for us.  Sample played solid last year and knows the system
And good blocker.  Hudson is just a fricken football players and handlers the tight end position just fine and to have him behind gesicki who’s ceiling is sky high with burrow really makes me content to say the least at the position.  
The help the bengals need and the damage the bengals can do forgetting about tight end for just a sec is very impressive imo.  Personally I’d love to trade up with Washington and I agree about pick 36 so ask for their pick 40.  Take Newton.   Or stay put.  Take Kris Jenkins.  Then maason smith at 80 and then Dominic Puni at 97.  U wanna talk tight end I’d be open to theo Johnson dallin hooker tanner mcglauphlin day 3.  But not day 2. Too many needs.  Tight end ain’t one.  My twin and I were more excited about bowers going to LV than mims coming to us and we wanted mims.  No to tight end.  Imo gesicki when he balls out sign him to a multi year deal and close the “revolving door”

I get all that, but Gesicki and Hudson are on 1-year contracts.
The coaches have said this offseason they'd ideally like to have someone here over multiple years to stabilize the position rather than have a revolving door.

Are you saying you're ok with continuing to have a new TE in the offense every year, even if they could get a guy who could potentially solidify that spot for a few years?