Israel/Hamas War Superthread

[Dill]

(04-26-2024, 07:03 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You got that I was quoting you, right? The accusation of uninformed bigotry originates with you.

I ask how YOU exempt YOURSELF from YOUR charge, when the students appear to
know more about the origins of the war and are defending Palestinian human rights.

Yeah, you asked how they're the bigot and not me?  That's an accusation of bigotry directed at me.  Poor Dill, little word games aren't working for you.
Feel it slipping away do you?  Don't worry, it's only going to get worse.

I asked, and am asking again--how do YOU exempt YOURSELF from YOUR charges, when you yourself
appear to know very little about the war and occupation, and are not defending Palestinian human rights?

Either the charges are based on some identifiable criteria applied to some evidence which can be shown to meet the criteria,
in which case you could explain the application, especially if "fact" is supposed to exempt you from "pomposity." 

Or it's just more of your projecting impressions, rules, and indefensible accusations onto people you don't like, 
regarding issues you demonstrably don't understand. And then deflecting my question by calling it an accusation
---"Y-y-you called ME a bigot!" followed by three more impressions.

That's sure what it looks like when you keep repeating that the protestors support Hamas because they support 
Palestinians and Hamas are Palestinians too; and that is "the fact" which makes THEM ignorant bigots and supposedly 
exempts you from "pomposity." They don't SAY they support Hamas, but they support Palestinians so . . . 

That's like saying I support Republicans because I support the Steelers and some of the Steelers are Republicans. 
I'm cheering Republicans at a Steeler game unless I hold up a sign that says "Go Steelers, except the Republicans." 
People weasel up logic like that when they double down on something they just want to believe badly.