01-05-2016, 10:16 PM
(01-02-2016, 10:11 AM)mallorian69 Wrote: Furthermore in Murdock v Pennsylvania the SCOTUS says that the states can not take a right and make it a privilege by forcing a person to pay for a permit.
That vwas a very fact specific case and you left out the most important word. The Court found that requiring a Jehovah's witness to pay for a permit was an UNREASONABLE infringement on his religious freedom. It NEVER said that no right enumerated in the Constitution can ever be regulated. Soliciting donations for a religious purpose can not be compared in any way with owninbg a deadly weapon.
There are many limitations on all rights granted in the Constitution.
