Stormy kills Bragg case

[*Nately120*]

(05-09-2024, 09:56 PM)FormerlyBengalRugby Wrote: Now you are playing games.

There is absolutely "lawfare" at foot with DJT, and the timing is no coincidence

Trump committed this potential crime in 2016, so there was no time to bring charges that wouldn't have been politically abhorrent since he's spent the last 8 years as the president, or as the GOP candidate for president, and after 2024 he's either again going to be the president or likely running for president.

When should this case have been brought for it to be declared totally A-ok and kosher?  I just don't see it.

(05-09-2024, 09:56 PM)FormerlyBengalRugby Wrote: If the law is on your side, we are figuring that out now.  Someone campaigned on putting DJT in jail, not exactly an unbiased source.

Our system has DA as an elected position, which requires running on cracking down on this and that.  Some DA's run on breaking up gangs, some run on being harder/easier on drug offenses, some run on this and that and so on and so forth.  If the law is after you, it's up to you to not break the law.

So the DA campaigned on putting Trump in jail and the people have spoken.  Lordy, a politician doing as the voters wish?  What a concept.  Trump should have committed all his crimes in Arkansas if he wanted a free pass.


And I brought up OJ because like OJ Trump is being defended by putting "the corrupt and biased system that is out to get the defendant" on trial.  I'm not lumping you in with the "witch hunt" folks, but the general defense of Trump is that the system is corrupt and targeting him, which sounds pretty OJ-adjacent to me.