Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tee is now the only tagged player without a new deal
#94
(05-17-2024, 07:20 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Many teams have gambled and put all-in on a season to win a Superbowl and won. However, I don't see Tee Higgins being that "gamble" that puts them over the top, keeping him around only maintains the status-quo. If the team makes a move right around the trade deadline, that will be the move that puts the team "over the top", that is if they are in serious contention at that point.

Yes teams have gone all in but usually they are teams with older cores. This team isn't old in any terms.  So why are the putting all their eggs into this basket?

Even if I were to believe the all in narrative then tell me why this team isn't spending up to the cap and why didn't they restructure any contracts in the free agency  period  to create  more cap space?

I could respect the all in theory, if they were actually going all in. However, they have used very little resources (outside of tagging Tee)to indicate the all in strategy.
https://twitter.com/JAKEAKAJ24
J24

Jessie Bates left the Bengals and that makes me sad!
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Tee is now the only tagged player without a new deal - J24 - 05-17-2024, 08:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)