OTAs

[*rfaulk34*]

(05-29-2024, 11:51 AM)jj22 Wrote: I never said it did. I said it was backup pay and if any of the 4 million was based on incentives and workout bonuses that he is missing we talking barely over vet minimum. Again, that isn't guaranteed starter money for RT.

People can twist my words all they want as they typically do when I speak fact and they hate to hear it, then they work themselves up into a frenzy over their own spin of my post. I don't know how clear I can be. But I said what I said and it's all in this thread. I never spoke on Browns ability to play. I spoke on what he is getting paid.

I'm not trying to twist, just pointing out that his small contract isn't really reflective of his ability on the field. I just think it's important to distinguish between the two. If he was more reliable, he'd be getting paid more.