05-30-2024, 01:25 PM
(05-30-2024, 12:42 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I have to say, close to twenty-five years working in the criminal justice system and I have never heard of a criminal case in which the judge instructed the jury that they don't have to agree on what crime was committed. That seems completely antithetical to our jury system and the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. It's like they're trying to give Trump and his proponents ammunition.
Indeed.
They are stacking the deck against themselves if they are actually trying to convict DJT.
Now if the charges are politically motivated to keep DJT off the campaign trail, then the plan is working perfectly.