5/30 ruling against Trump

[Mike M (the other one)]

(05-31-2024, 07:32 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Like what the $35 donation?

If that is grounds for recusal. Well then we need to talk about SCoTUS and Cannon.

How many POTUS candidates do you think we have had that cheated on their wife and cooked up a scheme to pay the mistress to stay silent and then falsified financial records to hide/write off the hush money? Do you or the author think this happens all the time and we just ignore it?

Well considering you guys are throwing a hissy over who a SCOTUS is politically aligned with....

Let's take a look at this little ethics code violation, maybe Bels can clear it up for us on how this applies to the Judge involved in this case:

Model Code of Judicial Conduct: Canon 4
Specifically Rule 4:1
(4)    solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution* to a political organization or a candidate for public office;




Wouldn't his $ donation be a major violation as he's not showing impartiality?