5/30 ruling against Trump

[NATI BENGALS]

(05-31-2024, 07:47 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Well, that would be one of the everything you didn't address, yes.  The least important, but one of them.



So, ignore that it's against the rules for this judge?  Also, you do know it's not against the rules for a SCOTUS justice, right?  Argue whether that's consistent, sure, but ignore it completely?  Nah.


Yes, he does, and yes, I do.  Not the exact, blow by blow scenario, but far more egregious things have been done by former POTUS' and if you think otherwise then you're either mentally handicapped or childishly naïve.  

And he got caught and punished “cautioned”. So a mark on his record if he messes up in the future. And he wasn’t the only one. “dozens of New York judges who had violated the rules against political contributions in recent years. Most were modest amounts, the report said, and many appeared to stem from the misperception that the rules only apply to state campaigns.” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/17/nyregion/trump-trial-judge-merchan-donations.html

So because someone may have gotten away with a crime in the past, it is absolutely unfair for this guy to be held accountable for his actions? I can’t even…