5/30 ruling against Trump

[Luvnit2]

(06-01-2024, 07:46 AM)pally Wrote: 1)  Both Justice's Alito and Thomas have told the world that a judge cannot be conflcited due to family members politics.
2) the charges were explained to him at the preliminary hearing.  He said he understood them.  If he didn't he had an opportunity to ask then and there/  He also has a very expensive legal team that could have broken down the charges.
3) That's not true at all.  Where their "expert" was restricted from talking about FEDERAL law which had no bearing on the state case and from explaining specific points o the law which is the job of the judge 
4) that will be a matter of opinion.  The jury was able to ask questions and did so.  

You know that is the kind of absolute BS that is ridiculous and proves you are letting yourself be led by lies and propaganda.  How has this country been "ruined"  And if this time and place are ruined, I feel for you if times really got tough.  Are things perfect heck no. but they weren't during the previous administration either.   

As I said, I am not a scholar, but many are saying this trial had numerous reversible errors.

Trump was the first person convicted in NY,first in long history of NY to be convicted on these charges. I understand you hate Trump, but think about the boomerang effect long term.

Harry Reid in 2014 changed the rule for judicial nominees from 60 votes to 50 votes to approve them. McConnell gave a speech and said it was a huge mistake and would cost Democrats later.

The result is we now have a 6-3 conservative (constitutional) SupremeCourt. I don’t know what the fallout will be in the future. But,there will be one.