5/30 ruling against Trump

[FormerlyBengalRugby]

(06-01-2024, 08:09 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: I called the take naive, not you individually. There is a difference. I focus on the action or statement and not the individual when I make statements like that for a reason. Someone making a naive statement does not make them inherently naive, just that particular statement.

Here is the Marist poll those numbers come from (which I didn't remember exactly correct because I was just basing it on recall memory from a summary article on the polling): https://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/NPR_PBS-NewsHour_Marist-Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables_202405301406.pdf

Here is also a poll that Reuters/Ipsos did over the past couple of days on the topic: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/one-10-republicans-less-likely-vote-trump-after-guilty-verdict-reutersipsos-poll-2024-05-31/

My apologies for getting back to this so late.

Your poll numbers seem to indicate in the manner of what I said of little to no difference in voting for DJT, with 17% of voters less likely to vote for him in the case of a conviction and 15% being more likely.

I appreciate the nothing-burger and your sources.

You have to look at both sides of the data, not just the side you want to see.

As Joe Dirt would say, that's day one stuff.