06-06-2024, 03:34 PM
(06-06-2024, 02:32 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Getting back on topic, the defense's opening arguments were shredded by the prosecution. There is only one way, he is not guilty and that is a sympathetic jury says no, not because he is not guilty, but he was an addict.
There is a reason he plead guilty, he was and is guilty. Also, if not for 2 whistle blowers, Weiss's DOJ was going to let it skate. Only the judge put an end to a plea deal or HB would have gotten off with no trials, either of the 2.
Hunter's legal woes continue as Congress is recommending, he and Uncle Jim be referred for criminal charges for lying to Congress. Of course, only Garland's DOJ can indict them.
I thought he plead guilty only because it was a sweetheart deal, which was rejected because the judge read and it stank?
