Jurror May have violated Duties in Trump NY case

[Dill]

(06-08-2024, 05:39 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Since when did a professional poster get turned into a troll?
Didn't you debunk or attempt to validate the following?
Hunter Laptop being authentic. You said laptop FBI had in 2019 was possibly tampered with by Russians????
HRC was not behind the Russian Dossier.
Joe Biden never knew about any business dealings about HB.
My point is simple, why would a judge issue a letter to defense and prosecution if had 0 chance of being true. You say it was debunked in less than 24 hours. A juror can have a professional poster. It does not mean it was debunked yet.

Where to start? I've never seen so many errors of judgment and fact concentrated in one post like that.

Maybe start with the bolded. A judge would issue such a letter because  true or false, such social media posts can have a legal and political effect,
as this thread shows. Just as Trump doxxing the judge's daughter can have an effect. If the judge doesn't issue that letter, he is derelict in duty.

The source has been found, and without further evidence, there is no reason to assume he could be a "professional poster" for one of the jurors
--unless one is just DESPARATE to rescue Trump from accountability.

Every intel analyst who raised suspicious about HB's Laptop was following evidence, precedent and protocol. 
HRC did not create the Steele Dossier. that's why it's not called the HRC dossier. 
Joe Biden knew his son HAD business dealings, and that's about all that can be proven.

Every one of the items you list has been subject to the same expansive, hyperbolic spin as you are attempting to generate about
the judge's letter, or another thread Biden's supposed stumbles in Normandy.  You rush to post before checking your sources.