06-13-2024, 11:40 AM
(06-13-2024, 11:27 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: What you're essentially saying here is that the 51 "experts" left enough wiggle room to claim plausible deniability.
Yeah that's quite possible, I did not exactly defend them. If I were to guess, I would agree that it's fairly certain that there was an intention to help out Biden, and as I said, that deserves critizism.
What I'm also saying is that your statement how people "swore in public that the laptop was 100% fake" is not entirely accurate. It wasn't my intention to prove that, but I wanted to know if that is actually true.
The only issue where I would defend those people a little is that, well, it indeed had earmarks of Russian disinformation. The comparison with Biden and his weird behaviour towards children is semi-apt in my book, but I understand the point you're making. It's not like republicans did not do something similar to what you describe though, effectively calling him a pedophile by just stopping short of calling him a pedophile. Which is not a defense of Biden, oh my, I wish you had a president that doesn't sniff girl's hair. Amongst other things.
And I did not click the video, for I already know what Biden does and it grosses me out too. One could indeed say he has the earmarks of, well, at least someone with some unhealthy urges. I for one could not really fault you if you were to say so (and maybe you did, a little), while not believing Biden actually acts out on pedophilia.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)