06-13-2024, 11:44 AM
(06-13-2024, 11:40 AM)hollodero Wrote: Yeah that's quite possible, I did not exactly defend them. If I were to guess, I would agree that it's fairly certain that there was an intention to help out Biden, and as I said, that deserves critizism.
What I'm also saying is that your statement how people "swore in public that the laptop was 100% fake" is not entirely accurate. It wasn't my intention to prove that, but I wanted to know if that is actually true.
The only issue where I would defend those people a little is that, well, it indeed had earmarks of Russian disinformation. The comparison with Biden and his weird behaviour towards children is semi-apt in my book, but I understand the point you're making. It's not like republicans did not do something similar to what you describe though, effectively calling him a pedophile by just stopping short of calling him a pedophile. Which is not a defense of Biden, oh my, I wish you had a president that doesn't sniff girl's hair. Amongst other things.
And I did not click the video, for I already know what Biden does and it grosses me out too. One could indeed say he has the earmarks of, well, at least someone with some unhealthy urges. I for one could not really fault you if you were to say so (and maybe you did, a little), while not believing Biden actually acts out on pedophilia.
So we essentially agree, it's just a difference of degree. I would say my assertion that they swore the laptop is 100% fake is a plausible as their claims, because that was very obviously, IMO, the intent of their joint statement. And making it a joint statement is itself another feather in the cap of the claim that they knew exactly what they were doing.
