06-13-2024, 12:14 PM
(06-13-2024, 12:02 PM)pally Wrote: But they didnt swear it was 100% false. They allowed for the possiblility that it was legit. what they said, that in their experience the laptop and how it came to the world's attention had fingeprints of Russian intelligence
Dont forget that knowledge of this laptop didn't occur until Oct of 2020. All that was known about it was stuff being thrown about by Guiliani and other Trump surrogate
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000
I've already addressed this point several times. This argument does not impress me at all. Throw in an eagerly complicit media and you're making a distinction without a difference.