Hunter Biden Trial Begins

[Luvnit2]

(06-13-2024, 12:33 PM)hollodero Wrote: So, not all that plausible :)



Sure, I would bet on the same thing. But I don't know it for a fact. There's the issue that the overall concern expressed was far from made up and far from moot. Russia is still meddling in elections in many ways. If I were to blame folks, I would also blame Giuliani for having a well-earned reputation of being a blatant liar (or Trump for being so unsettling that folks retort to these means, but that's sure disputable), and in the end I'm still more angry at him than at these people. And though surprisingly no one asked me despite all my experience as an internet user, I might even have signed off on such a letter too (just to regret it later, of course). Nothing said in it is untrue. They even state that "we want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement -- just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role" - and I get that sentiment.

That being said, it was still a mistake and most likely their intentions were partisan ones, it's just that I can not be all that mad about it really. In general, as stated I consider the laptop to be a tad blown out of proportion by right-wing pundits by now.

Do you realize there is evidence of Hunter bribing people? Do you know there is evidence on the laptop Joe Biden, Jim Biden and others were involved in Hinter's influence peddling? Why do you feel this should not be investigated by an impartial outside special counsel? If innocent, just like the Russian collusion hoax, the Bidens will be cleared just as Trump was years ago.