Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Justification for Political Violence
#1
I'm curious to see what board members think.

At what point would you, Dem, Republican, Independent, etc; think it was okay to take the life of someone who disagreed with you politically?

Would you be okay with it if it facilitated a better future for the nation in your eyes? For your kids and whatnot?

Would you be okay with it if the government in power at a given time endorsed the violence and guaranteed you zero legal accountability for your actions?

Would you be fine with it if it eliminated a perceived "social cancer" that was negatively impacting the overall good of the nation?

Would you be indifferent as long as it was happening at a safe-ish distance from your doorstep?

Would it be justifiable if it vastly improved the economic outlook for you personally or the nation overall?

Is it justifiable on religious grounds, ie holy war ordered by a representative of God himself?

Would it only be justifiable as a means of protecting one's own life in the instance of a direct threat?

Is it justified if you think an electoral or legal decision is unfair or fraudulent? Are these aforementioned outcomes just too much for the current legal system to handle effectively without a show of violent force from the populace?
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Justification for Political Violence - samhain - 06-16-2024, 10:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)