06-16-2024, 11:24 PM
So I've been reading Chapter 17, which address changes to be made in the DOJ.
https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-17.pdf
The claimed motivation is that there is great public distrust in the DOJ, evidence for which is a series of bullets that read like
Fox News/Newsmax banners.
The weight of the publicly available evidence indicates that there are many reasons for this lack of trust. For example:
l The Federal Bureau of Investigation, knowing that claims of collusion with Russia were false,5
collaborated with Democratic operatives to inject the story into the 2016 election through strategic media leaks, falsified
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant applications, and lied to Congress.6
l Personnel within the FBI engaged in a campaign to convince social media companies and the media generally that the story about the contents
of Hunter Biden’s laptop was the result of a Russian misinformation campaign—while the FBI had possession of the laptop the entire time and
could have clarified the authenticity of the source.7
l The DOJ engaged in conduct to chill the free speech rights of parents across the United States in response to supposed “threats” against school boards,8yet it failed to engage in any concerted campaign to protect the rights of Americans who actually were terrorized by acts of violence like those
perpetrated against pregnancy care centers.9
l The FBI tasked agents with monitoring social media and flagging content they deemed to be “misinformation” or “disinformation” (not associated
with any plausible criminal conspiracy to deprive anyone of any rights) for platforms to remove.10
l The FBI engaged in a domestic influence operation to pressure social media companies to report more “foreign influence” than the FBI was actually
seeing and stop the dissemination of and censor true information directly related to the 2020 presidential election.11
l The department has devoted unprecedented resources to prosecuting American citizens for misdemeanor trespassing o"enses or violations of theFACE Act12 while dismissing prosecutions against radical agents of the Left like Antifa.13
l The department has consistently threatened that any conduct not aligning with the liberal agenda “could” violate federal law—without actually taking
a position that the conduct in question is illegal—using the prospect of protracted litigation and federal sanctions to chill disfavored behavior
such as with state e"orts to restrict abortion14 or prevent genital mutilation of children.15
l The department has sued multiple states regarding their e"orts to enhance election integrity.16
l The department has failed to do its part to stop the flood of fentanyl and other deadly drugs that are flowing across our borders and decimating
families and communities across the United States.17
l The department has abdicated its responsibility to assist in the enforcement of our immigration laws and has engaged in wholescale abandonment of its
duty to adjudicate cases in the immigration court system.
These actions stand in stark contrast to Attorney General Merrick Garland’s assertion before taking o!ce that “there [must] not be one rule for Democrats and another for Republicans, one rule for friends and another for foes.”18
A scary list of concerns to be implemented by the only president who actually actually attempted a coup and tried to coerce his DOJ to help him. Nothing about that so far in my reading, though. No mention of the FBI re-opening the Hilary email investigation two weeks before election in 2016.
https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-17.pdf
The claimed motivation is that there is great public distrust in the DOJ, evidence for which is a series of bullets that read like
Fox News/Newsmax banners.
The weight of the publicly available evidence indicates that there are many reasons for this lack of trust. For example:
l The Federal Bureau of Investigation, knowing that claims of collusion with Russia were false,5
collaborated with Democratic operatives to inject the story into the 2016 election through strategic media leaks, falsified
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant applications, and lied to Congress.6
l Personnel within the FBI engaged in a campaign to convince social media companies and the media generally that the story about the contents
of Hunter Biden’s laptop was the result of a Russian misinformation campaign—while the FBI had possession of the laptop the entire time and
could have clarified the authenticity of the source.7
l The DOJ engaged in conduct to chill the free speech rights of parents across the United States in response to supposed “threats” against school boards,8yet it failed to engage in any concerted campaign to protect the rights of Americans who actually were terrorized by acts of violence like those
perpetrated against pregnancy care centers.9
l The FBI tasked agents with monitoring social media and flagging content they deemed to be “misinformation” or “disinformation” (not associated
with any plausible criminal conspiracy to deprive anyone of any rights) for platforms to remove.10
l The FBI engaged in a domestic influence operation to pressure social media companies to report more “foreign influence” than the FBI was actually
seeing and stop the dissemination of and censor true information directly related to the 2020 presidential election.11
l The department has devoted unprecedented resources to prosecuting American citizens for misdemeanor trespassing o"enses or violations of theFACE Act12 while dismissing prosecutions against radical agents of the Left like Antifa.13
l The department has consistently threatened that any conduct not aligning with the liberal agenda “could” violate federal law—without actually taking
a position that the conduct in question is illegal—using the prospect of protracted litigation and federal sanctions to chill disfavored behavior
such as with state e"orts to restrict abortion14 or prevent genital mutilation of children.15
l The department has sued multiple states regarding their e"orts to enhance election integrity.16
l The department has failed to do its part to stop the flood of fentanyl and other deadly drugs that are flowing across our borders and decimating
families and communities across the United States.17
l The department has abdicated its responsibility to assist in the enforcement of our immigration laws and has engaged in wholescale abandonment of its
duty to adjudicate cases in the immigration court system.
These actions stand in stark contrast to Attorney General Merrick Garland’s assertion before taking o!ce that “there [must] not be one rule for Democrats and another for Republicans, one rule for friends and another for foes.”18
A scary list of concerns to be implemented by the only president who actually actually attempted a coup and tried to coerce his DOJ to help him. Nothing about that so far in my reading, though. No mention of the FBI re-opening the Hilary email investigation two weeks before election in 2016.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
