06-21-2024, 09:27 AM
(06-21-2024, 09:19 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: I would certainly hope not. Disregarding the implications to, you know, free speech there are more than a few recent examples of shall we say inconvenient truths being labeled as "disinformation" for political expedience.
Censorship "for the public good" is how it starts...
Jimbob can stand on the corner and hold a sign and talk to anybody he wants about freebasing ivermectin to remove the vaccine microchip so that the next election isn't rigged.
The government doesn't control social media. But the government does monitor social media. And if they see a movement/group that threatens our country. They are supposed to do something.
Hey. Musk. Those guys posting on twitter that they won. They actually lost. Just because that mob of people showed up that doesn't mean they won. They are starting a civil war with lies that are being perpetuated on your platform. We might sue you.
