Garland in handcuffs for obstruction?

[Luvnit2]

(06-26-2024, 05:37 PM)hollodero Wrote: What he actually said is that “We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” - so what he actually said was about how Biden would present himself to a jury, not that he is unable to stand trial. Nowhere does Hur say that.
Since you are probably keenly aware of the exact quotes, I have to wonder whether your constant misrepresentation of them is deliberate. If so, not cool.

Hur also concluded that “the evidence is not sufficient to convict” and “no criminal charges are warranted”, so there's no smoking gun to be had. All Republicans could possibly want from any tapes is some ammunition for a personal hit against Biden. How can this not be way too minuscule to threaten contempt and arrest.

Herr is what he said. Yes, the part you referenced he said. But he said a lot more. He defended his report as accurate. He pointed out examples of why he said an elderly man with a poor memory. One was he did not remember the year his son died. He also had trouble remembering events during his time as VP. Hur did say he did commit crimes also.

I have it attached so read the entire thing, if you do it shows exactly why Congress needs to listen to the tapes and so does the entire country prior to the election. If Biden has nothing to hide, why make any attempt to block the tapes?
Special counsel Hur defends comments about Biden mental state in classified documents probe | Courthouse News Service