Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Garland in handcuffs for obstruction?
#7
(06-26-2024, 07:25 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Herr is what he said. Yes, the part you referenced he said. But he said a lot more. He defended his report as accurate. He pointed out examples of why he said an elderly man with a poor memory. One was he did not remember the year his son died. He also had trouble remembering events during his time as VP. Hur did say he did commit crimes also.

Mr. Hur did still never say that Biden is unable to stand trial. He stands by the accuracy of his report. You don't. You make stuff up that isn't in there. Also, which actual crimes did Mr. Hur accuse Biden of, as your last sentence clearly states as fact?


(06-26-2024, 07:25 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I have it attached so read the entire thing, if you do it shows exactly why Congress needs to listen to the tapes and so does the entire country prior to the election. If Biden has nothing to hide, why make any attempt to block the tapes?

Beause of people like you, who only want to use them for a personal hit job. Why would Biden and his team be so stupid to feed you? There is nothing relevant in the tapes, just your hope that something can be snippeted to Biden looking senile and incompetent. Congress does not have to listen to the tapes, they already got a report, a transcript and there really is zero need to further know about the one time someone reminded Biden of the year his son died because he only said the exact day. And really, it's so gross to even go these places in the first place.

Of course with handcuffing the AG and everything. Let's not make this appear politically un-weaponized in any way.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Garland in handcuffs for obstruction? - hollodero - 06-26-2024, 08:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)