Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Garland in handcuffs for obstruction?
#8
(06-26-2024, 07:55 PM)FormerlyBengalRugby Wrote: Failure to comply should have some consequences. If there are no teeth, who would comply?

I am not sure if this is the opportunity, but sometimes an example has to be made to come into compliance.

Shouldn't we start with members of Congress who have ignored subpoenas?  If they ignore them from their own body then why should anyone else comply
 

 Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
 




Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Garland in handcuffs for obstruction? - pally - 06-26-2024, 08:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)