Project 2025

[Mike M (the other one)]

(06-19-2024, 07:25 PM)Dill Wrote: ??? I'm guilty about defending myself?? How? Where? From what??

No one asked you whether LGBTQ were "protected." The question was whether you support equal rights for LGBTQ citizens. 

I'm not getting a clear answer on whether you, having declared yourself "more open-minded" than I, support equal rights for LGBTQ citizens.

I asked you of you think the LGBTQ rights are more important that the Womens rights, specifically in women only sports. 
The LGBTQ are a protected group. I have no issues with their rights and defending them, except in Women's sports, for the simple reason they are not biological women. Their bodies are built differently from day 1. 

(06-19-2024, 07:25 PM)Dill Wrote: What we "covered" is that your "perception" differs from what Bukter actually said. Mine does not. 
In post #44 you wrote: If you chose the men over the women, then you are no better than Harrison Butker. 

That assumes Butker chooses men over women, doesn't it? Or is that only my "perception" again? 

Yes if that's your perception, then i will hold  you to it for picking Trans Mens rights over women's rights. Because that's the perception you built, so you have to stick with it.  

(06-19-2024, 07:25 PM)Dill Wrote: I'll "own" that I don't think trans people with muscular-skeletal frames that developed as masculine should be allowed to compete in women's sports, though I think women should be allowed to compete in some men's sports--football, soccer, wrestling, basketball, baseball, hockey--if they can make the team. No one can claim they have a special advantage. 

As far as the legal challenge to Title IX, that's 96 pages and I'm still reading it. On the surface the "gender" addition is certainly parallel to other kinds of discrimination. The question is whether and the degree to which its imposition harms another group.  

Flip-Flop, so you aren't always about equal rights. Lia Thomas says "shame on you."