Garland in handcuffs for obstruction?

[hollodero]

(06-27-2024, 10:28 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Spot on. Hur wrote a report summarizing 6 hours of interviews. It was impossible to put every detail in his report. But the actual 6-hour audio would give the Congress and the voters exactly what Biden said, how he said it and his energy level.

What are Democrats attempting to hide?

Is it usual common practice that tapes of US presidents get publicized in full, even when 6 hours long? Are there dozens of such 6 hour tapes of closed door talks from former presidents around for the public to examine? Seems I know of little to no precedent for that since Nixon. So why would Biden ever do that? There's indeed zero chance that you do not find the occasional misspeaking in 6 hours of tape, such snippets would get thrown together for an attack ad and Biden is all the wiser to not allow for that. He claimed executive privilege, like Trump did a million times too, it is a well established right of a president and republicans need to respect that, just as they expected others to respect it. 

Not to mention that after such a precedent, it would become increasingly difficult to ever question - or in general- talk to - a president in the future when said president knows that the conversation does not stay confidential.

This whole obstinate enthusiasm over getting these tapes, with no other purpose then just hoping Biden makes an asss of himself somewhere, is unsettling. And that's coming from the same folks that - with quite some merit - claim that Biden gets easily beat on the policy issues. Beat him on the policy issues then. This just looks petty.