06-12-2015, 03:53 PM
(06-12-2015, 02:59 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: Apparently they didn't mean "property" the way they mean it now or something.
Humans as "property" seems like it would always be immoral, but that's just me. I mean I understand the need to work for a living, but that sort of arrangement seems a bit extreme.
That line should be "disturbing" to all people, but it is amazing the things some people are able to rationalize in order to make sense of their beliefs.
Yeah, I've never understood when people try so hard to place caveats on "owning people". I mean WTF? In what situation is having ownership rights over another human being...a moral thing?
I'm all for people believing in whatever they choose. But, those people, in the year 2015, who still think it was OK to ever own other human beings, in any context...creep me the f--k out!
