Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Butt "catch"
#10
(01-10-2016, 05:19 PM)motoarch Wrote: Because in all of though cases the receiver lost possession.  Bryant never lost possession and the ball never touched the ground.

Yeah, it wasn't the same as those plays.  What it was was a receiver bobbling the ball as he went out of bounds and not getting two feet in with clear possession.  Doesn't matter that it never touched the ground.  Receivers bobble all the time on the sidelines, then secure the ball when they are out of bounds and they are never called catches.  That was not a catch.
Well does he have a name or should I call him... lawyer?
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
The Butt "catch" - CJ2etc - 01-10-2016, 04:58 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - InTheJungleNow9 - 01-10-2016, 05:07 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - GreenCornBengal - 01-10-2016, 05:09 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - fisherscatfan - 01-10-2016, 05:20 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - CJ2etc - 01-10-2016, 05:24 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - jfkbengals - 01-10-2016, 05:22 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - motoarch - 01-10-2016, 05:13 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - thegimp - 01-10-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - motoarch - 01-10-2016, 05:19 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - InTheJungleNow9 - 01-10-2016, 05:23 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - jfkbengals - 01-10-2016, 05:24 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - fisherscatfan - 01-10-2016, 05:32 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - SunsetBengal - 01-10-2016, 05:38 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - thegimp - 01-10-2016, 05:35 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - CJ2etc - 01-10-2016, 05:21 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - thegimp - 01-10-2016, 05:36 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - jfkbengals - 01-10-2016, 05:54 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - GreenCornBengal - 01-10-2016, 05:37 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - Thundercloud - 01-10-2016, 05:42 PM
RE: The Butt "catch" - Stonyhands - 01-10-2016, 05:54 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)