Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Think the refs were biased?
#36
Signed, but we already know the narrative playing out that Burfict and Jones are dirty players and pissburg can do no wrong. The narrative is that the Bengals can never win a playoff game even if we out score the opposition 40-0.
I've long believed that the NFL is a corrupt business with outcomes quite often predetermined to favor one team or the other, but try to prove it and you'll be called a tin foil hat salesman.
Hell, just look at stadium financing deals where tax payers foot the bill for multi million dollar monstrosities that are only used 6 times a year and maybe a few more if the team is in the playoffs.
In any other line of work the stuff that goes on during games would land most of us in prison for assault.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"

Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.


[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Think the refs were biased? - Attackcat - 01-11-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - pally - 01-11-2016, 02:45 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - corpjet - 01-11-2016, 03:01 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - Joelist - 01-11-2016, 03:14 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - BengalB - 01-11-2016, 04:47 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - grampahol - 01-11-2016, 04:48 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - J24 - 01-11-2016, 06:46 PM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - Utts - 01-12-2016, 03:27 AM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - CJ2etc - 01-12-2016, 11:37 AM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - M.W. - 01-12-2016, 11:26 AM
RE: Think the refs were biased? - Housh - 01-12-2016, 01:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)