Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Chip Kelly
#18
(01-13-2016, 06:12 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: What is experimental about an offense that was 2nd, 5th, and 12th in the NFL with a combo of Michael Vick, Nick Foles, Mark Sanchez, and Sam Bradford at QB? He has made a name for himself as a coach because he is an offensive master mind. And he won't be the one with the challenge flag.

The great offenses and the horrible defenses were both products of his system. You hurry up every play, push the ball down the field and score quickly, never controlling the ball, just push,push, push. Your defense spends all day on the field, and at the end of the day are exhausted and can't stop anybody so more often than not you lose the game along with piling up injuries to your defense. The glossy offensive ranks and numbers are deceiving and mean little if you don't win the game, you have to control the ball and the clock to keep both squads healthy. Another reason for the great offensive stats are the teams in their division have no defenses, Washington was the best they have to offer, and they made the Packers look like an offensive juggernaut for the first time in two months.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-13-2016, 04:47 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - The Real Deal - 01-13-2016, 04:47 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - jfkbengals - 01-13-2016, 08:31 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Who Dey Time - 01-13-2016, 04:48 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-13-2016, 05:27 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - milksheikh - 01-13-2016, 04:48 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - CageTheBengal - 01-13-2016, 04:56 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-13-2016, 05:24 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - CageTheBengal - 01-13-2016, 05:32 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - fredtoast - 01-14-2016, 12:24 AM
RE: Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-14-2016, 01:03 AM
RE: Chip Kelly - fredtoast - 01-14-2016, 05:13 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - fredtoast - 01-14-2016, 05:17 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - XenoMorph - 01-14-2016, 05:12 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - GreenCornBengal - 01-13-2016, 05:06 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - corpjet - 01-13-2016, 05:10 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Interceptor - 01-13-2016, 05:17 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - BonnieBengal - 01-13-2016, 05:25 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - zygrot24 - 01-13-2016, 05:50 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Bengalsrob - 01-13-2016, 05:56 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-13-2016, 06:12 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Bengalsrob - 01-13-2016, 08:03 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - NKYRob - 01-13-2016, 06:47 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - ItsOdellThurman - 01-13-2016, 07:04 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Beaker - 01-13-2016, 08:05 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-13-2016, 11:18 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - cincyfan429 - 01-13-2016, 08:35 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - TheLeonardLeap - 01-13-2016, 08:36 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Shake n Blake - 01-13-2016, 08:41 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - McC - 01-13-2016, 08:41 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - cincyfan429 - 01-13-2016, 08:43 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Clep - 01-13-2016, 10:48 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Fan_in_Kettering - 01-13-2016, 10:55 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - StLucieBengal - 01-13-2016, 10:58 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - NATI BENGALS - 01-13-2016, 11:31 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - McC - 01-13-2016, 11:32 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - StLucieBengal - 01-14-2016, 02:39 AM
RE: Chip Kelly - Bengal Dude - 01-14-2016, 05:08 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Nately120 - 01-14-2016, 05:58 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Bengal Dude - 01-14-2016, 06:03 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - ochocincos - 01-14-2016, 06:15 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - McC - 01-14-2016, 06:21 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - Nately120 - 01-14-2016, 06:23 PM
RE: Chip Kelly - reuben.ahmed - 01-14-2016, 06:37 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)