Not a Catch

[GMDino]

(01-16-2016, 04:45 PM)TRsome Wrote: You know, I'm a bit surprised you're arguing this. I thought you were a bit more level headed. The head of officiating said that he was looking at it with a clean slate that it would be "no catch." What does that mean to you? I really don't care if the refs called it on the field and didn't have enough evidence to fix their mistake. He's saying the correct call would have been "no catch". NO CATCH. The rest of it is explaining why that wasn't called on the field.

I'm only arguing that half of what Blandino says is BS as he has zero experience on the field as a ref.  His only experience is with replay...and so I find his statement disingenuous as he then goes on to say replay couldn't overturn the call.