Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD
#18
(01-17-2016, 06:46 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: Lol, now I'm an apparent steelers fan

You poor morons are so mentally fragile.

Can't fathom a Bengal fan who isn't an ignorant homer.  We suck

Let's try living in the real world for a second...I know that will be hard for you, but give it a chance.

"We suck" - The team was 12-4 and lost by 2 points in the rain with some very curious calls to say the least. No, the team does not suck, but yes the team did lose the game.

Mentally fragile - If you feel that everyone here is so "mentally fragile" it shows that you have no self esteem or self worth since you are here seeking validation from those same people.

The league can spin it anyway they want on the hit was "legal" but it is an empty phrase when you read the article and hear the same guy say it's "legal" then go on to say but these are the hits we want to remove from the game...... Tell me again how a "legal" hit is one you want out of the game. It's called saving face, that is all the league is doing.

[Image: bengals08-1-800small.jpg]




[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Murdock2420 - 01-17-2016, 06:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)