01-21-2016, 12:55 AM
(01-21-2016, 12:47 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Why the last four years? Because I am not saying the Bengals haven't ever drafted well, my whole point was the Bengals haven't drafted great for the last four years. So why would I use 6 years to prove my point of 4 years?
My point was the Bengals DID draft well then, which has led to people automatically saying they're still drafting well now, even though for the last four years it hasn't been true.
It's not cherry picking, it's the only pertinent information to the conversation.
- - - - -
"Who is the best QB of the 21st century? Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, or Aaron Rodgers?" - Me
"WHY DON'T YOU MENTION JOE MONTANA, CHERRY PICKER!" - You
^^^ This is pretty much what you're doing right now.
But it is ridiculous to judge a draft class after just one or two years.
Why do you choose tpo frame the conversation tyo make the Bengal lok as bad as possible.........Nevermind, I am familiar with your post. You live to ***** and cry. You are consistently one of the most negative posters here. You bend over backwards to make the bengals look bad.
Want to have an open conversation about the Bengals draft record regarding ALL players in the league right now instead of just choosing the one small sample size that makes the Bengals look as bad as possible?
