Sam Brownback cuts medicaid funding to Planned Parentood

[GMDino]

(01-21-2016, 01:39 AM)bfine32 Wrote: The sense is made that they should be required to agree on the course of action. I have answered the question. She should be required to carry the child to term and then surrender all rights and responsibilities.

You support laws that allows a woman to terminate her financial  responsibility or rearing a child and not a male based solely on biological  differences and that makes no sense at all.

Would it matter if the father was transgender and felt she too was pregnant or do you just what your laws to address reality?

(01-21-2016, 01:55 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Quit asking, start answering.

Does transgender count or do we just have our laws deal with reality? 

(01-21-2016, 08:48 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: So essential imprisonment, then? Who will compensate for the healthcare, the potential lost wages (since paid maternity leave isn't a thing here), and any health effects after the pregnancy that may result from the trauma?

He's already throwing in the question of transgender rights as a father Matt.  He certainly doesn't really care he just hates abortion and wants to fight about it.

But heaven forbid someone say the conservatives want women to be subservient and human incubators because we are taking their position "out of context".  Just never have sex unless you are married to a man that you can never leave because sky man said it was bad.  And if he gets you pregnant...whether you wanted it or not...it is a gift from the same sky man.  Quit arguing with the sky man!!!