Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Toxic differential rankings
#7
(01-23-2016, 10:44 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Bengals would have been significantly better on that list if Jeremy Hill didn't turd it up all year. 1 rush of 20+ yards from him, plus another 2 from Gio set them at 3 from their two main RBs. (As many as Wilson and Newton, the two teams ahead of the Bengals each had on their own.)

Should be at the top of that list if Dalton comes back and is still 2015 Dalton, and Hill comes back and decides he wants to run hard/fast for a change. Nice link, StLu.

Kind of shows it was more of a blocking problem than a RB problem when there's only 3 20+ runs between two backs we know can do it better than that.

Hopefully replacing Andre will help that and possibly Bodine if we bring in competition for him.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Toxic differential rankings - Yojimbo - 01-24-2016, 03:09 AM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - pdub2005 - 01-26-2016, 10:36 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - Go Cards - 01-23-2016, 11:07 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-26-2016, 12:07 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-26-2016, 01:27 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-26-2016, 03:52 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-26-2016, 06:18 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-26-2016, 09:25 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-26-2016, 10:20 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - spazz70 - 01-27-2016, 12:18 PM
RE: Toxic differential rankings - tlotharw - 01-27-2016, 08:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)