01-28-2016, 04:41 PM
(01-28-2016, 03:58 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Stallin was killing his generals and the Russian army wasn't much of anything, he wasn't well-equipped and his army had outdated equipment/weapons, and Russia had no allies, among other reasons.
Hitler would have been better off if the Russians tried to invade.
Typical Fred.
Anything that's not his original thought isn't valuable or worth reading.
The pot's calling the kettle black!
Just curious if we are on the same page with something that most people might not think is not relevant to the conversation, but if we are on the same page we do see the relevance.
Most participating in this thread are referencing "Soviets" whereas you and I are referencing "Russians". A lot of people just interpret these as the same but I don't. I'll add most people that DON'T interpret these as the same thing will think we are wrong to say "Russian" instead of "Soviet" but I don't .
So the curiosity, do you just see it as the same thing or do you have a different reason to say "Russia"? There really isn't anything wrong if you are just using them as synonyms but just curious if you make a distinction.
