Most Overrated Bengals

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(01-31-2016, 10:56 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I never said Sanu was better than Hilton but you called Sanu overrated and mentioned Hilton in a comparison .. not me... but i don;t see how you can compare the two.. Hilton is a #1 .. Sanu #2/3.  I don't see how Sanu is overrated when you look at this that way.. also you are comparing Hilton 4 year total to Sanu 3 year total... so you are using some misleading stats ...  put Sanu on a pass happy Indy team in place of Hilton and I will stand by his stats would not be that different than Hilton today....

As for Pittsburgh.. I focused on top 3/4 round picks and showed they had some real dudes, i will have to let go Reid , since you are correct he was Cowher draft.. but lets put in Archer in, he was drafted as a WR and did nothing.  The totals for Sweed 2nd round and Archer 3rd round are a combined 92 yards receiving.. hell even Jordan Shipley had 614 yards receiving.   

My main point was that Steelers have not drafted out of this world early in WRs either and I am correct
 that Wallace is only WR outside of Brown to have over 4,000 yards with Tomlin at the helm... 

So back at ya baby.. 

It's actually REALLY easy to compare the two. Hilton is a #1 WR, and Sanu is a borderline-#3-4 WR... and both were taken in the same round. That right there tells you how easy it is to compare. One is good enough to help carry an offense, the other is barely good enough to ride AJ Green's coattails. One is a two time Pro Bowler, the other is a one time NFL Drop Leader.

Once again, Hilton and Sanu have both been around for four years. Why do you persist on saying Sanu has only been in the league for 3? Same draft, same round. That's WHY they were both brought up.

You're actually wrong about Wallace and Brown. You forgot Emmanuel Sanders, who has 4,569 yards.


So.. not back at me at all, really. You just keep spouting off 100% wrong "facts" as your argument. Do a bit of research before trying to make a point, man.