02-03-2016, 11:03 AM
Total non-story.
There is absolutely nothing in this story that backs up the claim made bu Wolfgang. He claims he was told to frame stories "in a way that serves Europe and the public good". So if he thought it would serve the public good to talk about the refugee problem he was free to do that.
This is exactly like the people who hear Obama claim we need tougher gun laws and then claim he said he was going to take away everyone's guns.
Plus hasn't there been a lot of news about the refugee problem broadcast in Germany? Maybe if they could point out some specific stories that were banned then they would have a point. BUt this one claim by itself is meaningless.
There is absolutely nothing in this story that backs up the claim made bu Wolfgang. He claims he was told to frame stories "in a way that serves Europe and the public good". So if he thought it would serve the public good to talk about the refugee problem he was free to do that.
This is exactly like the people who hear Obama claim we need tougher gun laws and then claim he said he was going to take away everyone's guns.
Plus hasn't there been a lot of news about the refugee problem broadcast in Germany? Maybe if they could point out some specific stories that were banned then they would have a point. BUt this one claim by itself is meaningless.
