02-10-2016, 03:40 PM
(02-10-2016, 03:01 PM)Go Cards Wrote: Certainly the team that selected 9 starters out of 31 drafted better percentage wise over the one who had 10 out of 50.
Still would rather have 10 starters over 9 though.
It depends on what the team got for all those picks they traded away and the quality of the starters.
You can't judge a draft solely on how many "starters" came out of them. That's a very Mike Brown way of looking at it.
For example, Tom Brady as a 6th rounder was possibly the best draft pick ever. Jerome Simpson wasn't a good draft pick, but he did start.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
