Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Didn't Hill Have Two Hands On The Ball?
#42
(02-13-2016, 01:18 PM)Harmening Wrote: No, arguing different stances on the same subject, trying to convince the other side to see it your way, is debating.

What did you want people to debate on this thread?  You asked why nobody talked to Hill prior to the fumble.  People responded that we don't what was said to Hill.  That's not debating.

You really have troubles with reading comprehension, don't you?

That, or, like I said, you're just a HUGE troll.

You and Fred should make a message board group to have a formal group for people who troll me to gather.  Pat and a few others would join, too  ThumbsUp




Messages In This Thread
RE: Why Didn't Hill Have Two Hands On The Ball? - BFritz21 - 02-13-2016, 04:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)