02-15-2016, 04:14 AM
(02-15-2016, 04:03 AM)Sovereign Nation Wrote: I have heard it all.... Not shocked, but a lawyer just told me that just because a group of people agree that they saw something is enough to get a conviction on an alleged incident.
No wonder you are outrage that Officer Wilson didn't get sent to trial.
You lost me again.
If there is conflicting eyewitness testimony then both sides have to be weighed against each other. But there is no conflicting eyewitness testimony to dispute that the officer was guilty of giving racial profiling orders.
As for officer Wilson, he very well may have been innocent. But there should have been a legitimate grand jury hearing instead of the circus they put on to make sure he walked. That was a perfect example of the trash you get when the defendant and the prosecutor are on the same side. That should never happen.
