02-15-2016, 03:30 PM
(02-15-2016, 03:04 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Yeah, yeah I get the technical definition of the term. I was speaking of the typical notion of sexual assault being where one party forces the other to actually have sex, or to perform some sort of gratification on them. I did say tasteless, when I alluded to it being a prank. Your implication that I may somehow enjoy that sort of thing was unwarranted, and over the top.
That's called rape.
I'm sorry you took my comment as meaning you'd enjoy the act. I was speaking of the enjoying the typical notion of it being a prank, not the action. Sorry you thought of the possibility of taking some sort of gratification from a dude's balls in your grill.
Nevertheless, had that been my intention, it would be no less unwarranted than thinking that a woman took Manning to court because she couldn't "accept it as a joke" or because "there was a great profit to be made." She was sexually assaulted. There's nothing to be taken as a joke.
