02-16-2016, 03:21 PM
(02-16-2016, 03:10 PM)Stormborn Wrote: So, lets get this straight:
We know he brings virtually no value as a receiver, maybe good for a play a year.
We know he is consistently average as a returner, who is hardly a threat to take it the distance.
The only valuable asset the man brings is... I guess he doesn't fumble returns.
Certainly we shouldn't reward this insane level of mediocrity by bringing him back, am I right?
He has consistently been above average as a kick returner for most of his career here.He is better than most return men in the league. I don't see how that is an "insane level of mediocrity". Half of the players in the league are below average. It is not that easy to replace a guy who is above average at all. If it was then every team n the league would have had a return man better than Tate.
