Manning lawsuit

[*Nately120*]

(02-15-2016, 03:04 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Yeah, yeah I get the technical definition of the term.  I was speaking of the typical notion of sexual assault being where one party forces the other to actually have sex, or to perform some sort of gratification on them.  I did say tasteless, when I alluded to it being a prank.  Your implication that I may somehow enjoy that sort of thing was unwarranted, and over the top.

Why, does it insult you when people insinuate that you should either dismiss or enjoy being sexually assaulted?  Just think if someone stuck his balls in your face and then when you made a fuss about it people went back into your history and came up with dirty jokes and/or explicit things you did or said to "prove" that it either didn't happen or you wanted it.

Ouch, I says!

(02-15-2016, 03:50 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Remember, we're talking about 20 years ago.  Times were different, as well as what many would consider sexual assault, or an ugly, tasteless prank. 

Wait, so 20 years ago if some guy put his balls in your face it would have been ok?

(02-15-2016, 04:12 PM)BengalHawk62 Wrote: "Teabagging" is now considered sexual assault?  Whoa, I'm glad I grew up in the time before social media and cell phones and cameras.  You guys would pry not have the pleasure of knowing me otherwise!  I'd probably be locked away in jail convicted of teabagging and pissing in public, an offense I learned which can land you on the 'sex offender list'.

Not to sound all judgy or anything, but did you really place your testicles in the faces of unwilling women when you were in your 20s?  I must have missed out on just being one of the guys, but that sounds a bit extreme.

Anywho, to any of the guys who think forcing your balls in a woman's face is ok...do your wives and/or daughters share your sentiment? Sounds like I have a lot of living to catch up on!