02-24-2016, 02:26 PM
Again.
Since 1992 how many investigations have resulted in any punishments for Mrs. Clinton?
Is this a "where there is smoke there MUST be a fire....somewhere" situation? That there wouldn't be all these investigations if she was guilty of...something?
Or is it like an involuntary tic that people figure she MUST be guilty of something so we will keep investigating until we can catch her and convict her?
I read a lot about how she is a "criminal" who "should be in jail" but I can't find where she was convicted of a crime that would require such a sentence.
Since 1992 how many investigations have resulted in any punishments for Mrs. Clinton?
Is this a "where there is smoke there MUST be a fire....somewhere" situation? That there wouldn't be all these investigations if she was guilty of...something?
Or is it like an involuntary tic that people figure she MUST be guilty of something so we will keep investigating until we can catch her and convict her?
I read a lot about how she is a "criminal" who "should be in jail" but I can't find where she was convicted of a crime that would require such a sentence.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.