Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ranking the NFL backfields (Bengals #6)
#25
(06-19-2015, 01:13 PM)djs7685 Wrote: Lmfao, you just proved my point.

All of Pittsburgh's numbers minus about 200 rushing yards and 40 of the receiving yards come from Bell alone.

You're being foolish (and a homer) if you're going to pretend that's an apples to apples comparison when DeAngelo only had 60 carries last year.

That old man DeAngelo Williams posted 843 rushing and 333 receiving on 227 total touches in 2013, ya know, the last time he actually played instead of using his completely skewed 2014 numbers.

That "idiot pothead" is likely the best overall RB in the entire league, but nice try to downplay him because you don't agree with his recreational activities and he plays for the black and yellow.

So, you really believe that Williams is going to get that many attempts with Bell as their #1? If he is then that would cut down on Bell's #s. Yeah Bell is most likely better than Hill or Gio, but It's not about who has the best running back. It's about who has the best backfield. Plus Hill being our #1 will increase our yards even more.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Ranking the NFL backfields (Bengals #6) - Brownshoe - 06-19-2015, 01:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)