Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Genetic editing in humans
#24
(03-21-2016, 03:12 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Me either.

I've grown jaded because the incentives in "science" are no longer to be right, but to be trusted.   You get published, you get tenure.

But everything they publish is peer reviewed.  They could feed us a load of garbage, but they can't do that to their peers.

plus with medical advances like this there are big dollars at stake.  That also works to seed out the BS.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-16-2016, 11:11 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Rotobeast - 03-16-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-16-2016, 02:54 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Rotobeast - 03-16-2016, 03:36 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-16-2016, 03:42 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-16-2016, 07:31 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 10:10 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-20-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-20-2016, 05:10 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-20-2016, 07:36 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 10:22 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - magikod - 03-16-2016, 08:34 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Rotobeast - 03-16-2016, 08:44 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 09:58 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-21-2016, 08:55 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-17-2016, 02:58 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-20-2016, 08:19 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-20-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-20-2016, 05:03 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - XenoMorph - 03-21-2016, 06:14 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-22-2016, 11:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)